< Masks

COVID: Can a surgical mask be used more than once?

Text updated on 2022-01-03

Yes, you can put on a worn surgical mask: just keep it for at least seven days before reusing it, preferably in a paper envelope. This reuse of masks reduces pollution and unnecessary expenditure during the pandemic COVID-19. If the surgical mask is dirty, it can be washed: it remains very effective on particles of 3 µm, but not on those of less than 1 µm.

During the COVID outbreak, you can reuse your surgical masks for yourself: between two uses, you just need to store your mask for a week in a paper envelope, while any coronaviruses that may be present on the mask are practically all inactivated.

Why reuse surgical masks?

Why is this reuse not officially recommended?
These surgical masks were designed in the 1960s for single use in a hospital environment under conditions of strict asepsis. Surgeons and nurses wear them to avoid contaminating the operating field, and not to infect the patient on the operating table with their saliva. The masks were sterile and were discarded after each operation.

It is with the COVID-19 pandemic (shortage of masks at the beginning, then massive consumption of surgical masks by the general public) that the issue of their recycling has become major. Nevertheless, governments and health authorities may fear the use of contaminated masks, and exchanges between users. In addition, manufacturers and retailers have an interest in selling as many masks as possible.

What is the evidence that this method is effective?
The method we propose is effective, but not absolutely: it does not clean dirty masks and does not sterilize them, and in case of massive contamination by coronavirus, some viruses may remain.

At room temperature, coronaviruses gradually lose their infecting power. On ordinary plastic this virus only survives for four days. On a mask experimentally contaminated with a high viral load, 99.9% to 99.99% of the coronaviruses SARS-CoV-2 are inactive after 7 days on the outside and 4 days on the inside. On the seventh day, between 0.01% and 0.1% of the starting viruses can still be extracted by washing the fibres.

We believe, however, that on a lightly contaminated mask there will be almost no virus left after 7 days, and that if any virus remains, it is strongly bound to the mask fibres by electrostatic attraction. Finally, the particles on the front of the mask cannot pass through it and therefore cannot be sucked in by the wearer of the mask. This reasoning is logical, and based on scientific data, but it does not guarantee the absolute effectiveness of the proposed method, which has never been rigorously tested with volunteers.

How can this be done in practice?
We are only talking here about the envelope method, which is the simplest and most practical. The members of our team have been using it for several months. For the other methods (dry heat, steam, disinfectant), see the question Can you reuse a mask?

Why storing masks in a paper envelope and not a plastic one?

How many times can you recycle your mask in this way?
The filtration power of surgical masks hardly changes after being worn (if they do not get wet), nor after being stored dry at room temperature because filtration is based on the mesh of the fibres and its electrostatic properties. After 30 uses, the loss of filtration and fit to the face makes the surgical mask comparable to a new fabric mask. Therefore, if one is careful, and the mask is not splashed, one can keep the mask for a very long time, and recycle it at least 20 or 30 times, allowing more than six months of use. Of course, you can choose to renew your masks more often.

Can you wash your surgical mask?
Yes, surgical masks can be washed and disinfected without losing their ability to filter 3 micron particles: after ten machine washes at 60°C with detergent and disinfectant, the filtration performance of 3 µm particles is very little affected, and it is the same after 5 wash+autoclave cycles. The breathability of the mask remains excellent, but the integrity of the elastics and the metal bar should be checked. However, the electrostatic charges of the polypropylene are lost after the first wash, which greatly reduces the retention of submicron particles. As aerosol droplets are generally between 0.5 and 1-5µm in size, the envelope method described above is preferable, as long as the mask is clean. That said, washing a surgical or FFP2 mask means swapping their effectiveness for that of a cloth mask (see the question Surgical mask or cloth mask: which to choose?). This will still filter out some of the aerosols, if not all, and therefore reduce the risk of contamination (see the question Does the severity of the disease COVID-19 depend on the dose of virus received?). Moreover, heating too much or for too long will damage the surgical mask, which is however resistant to 70°C for one hour.

Is this method as effective for FFP2/N95 masks?
Yes, the envelope method also works with FFP2 masks, especially the duck beaks that can be flattened into envelopes.

In conclusion, this efficient and economical method is simple enough to be used in practice for a long time. It is not risky, because the same person will always use the recycled masks, which cancels out the risk of transmitting germs other than coronaviruses. It is not ideal, since it does not guarantee total disinfection of the masks, but it is better than what many people do when they use their cloth masks as a cotton handkerchief: folded in the pocket, sometimes damp, taken out and put away many times without washing hands, and washed only when it is visibly too dirty to wear.


facebook twitter linkedin


A rigorous study shows that seven days after five hundred thousand viruses have been deposited on a mask, the virus is undetectable on the inner layer (mouth side). On the other hand, washing the outer layer of the mask reveals 0.1% of the viruses. On paper, no virus is detectable three hours after deposit of coronaviruses. This study also shows that the virus does not survive two days at 37°C and not 30 minutes at 56°C.

Chin, A., Chu, J., Perera, M., Hui, K., Yen, H. L., Chan, M., ... & Poon, L. (2020). Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in different environmental conditions. The Lancet Microbe.

Another scientific study that shows that 99.99% of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is deactivated after 7 days on a surgical mask.

Liu, Y., Li, T., Deng, Y., Liu, S., Zhang, D., Li, H., ... & Zhou, Y. (2020). Stability of SARS-CoV-2 on environmental surfaces and in human excreta. medRxiv.

This study shows that the virus SARS-CoV-2 only survives 4 days on plastic.

van Doremalen, N., Bushmaker, T., Morris, D. H., Holbrook, M. G., Gamble, A., Williamson, B. N., ... & Lloyd-Smith, J. O. (2020). Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. New England Journal of Medicine.

This study shows that the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus does not survive five days when left to dry on a glass plate at 20-25°C. At 37°C the virus dried on glass doesn't even survive 24 hours.

Chan, K. H., Sridhar, S., Zhang, R. R., Chu, H., Fung, A. F., Chan, G., ... & Yuen, K. Y. (2020). Factors affecting stability and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Hospital Infection, 106(2), 226-231.

Ninety million masks per month are needed by health workers to control the epidemic of COVID-19, according to WHO estimates (March 2020). This estimate does not take into account the use of masks by the general population.

World Health Organization. (2020). Shortage of personal protective equipment endangering health workers worldwide. Newsroom, March, 3, 2020.

A University College London working group has estimated that the current demand for masks in the UK is 24.7 billion masks per year. If every person in the UK uses a single-use mask every day for one year, this will create 123,000 tonnes of non-recyclable plastic waste.

Report of UCL Plastic Waste Innovation Hub. The environmental dangers of employing single-useface masks as part of a COVID-19 exit strategy.

The release of a huge number of plastic surgical masks into the environment is leading to an unprecedented phenomenon of visual, biological and chemical pollution on a global scale, in all ecosystems. It is in marine environments that the impact of microplastics is likely to be most harmful.

Aragaw, T. A. (2020). Surgical face masks as a potential source for microplastic pollution in the COVID-19 scenario. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 159, 111517.

A well illustrated article showing the challenge posed by the release of billions of disposable masks into the environment. The consequences of these discharges are evoked, in particular the increase in microplastics content in the oceans. These microplastics are a threat to marine fauna, and a possible source of poisoning and infection for people.

Fadare, O. O., & Okoffo, E. D. (2020). Covid-19 face masks: A potential source of microplastic fibers in the environment. The Science of the total environment, 737, 140279.

This non-scientific article, among many others, denounces the ugliness and danger of masks spread in the environment. It talks about the many surgical masks found in the Mediterranean Sea and on the beaches of the Soko Islands in Hong Kong. Turtles and dolphins can mistake them for food, choke and die.

Kassam, A. More masks than jellyfish': coronavirus waste ends up in ocean. 8 June 2020. Article in The Guardian.

Dry heat at 80°C for one hour does not significantly reduce the filtration capacity, breathability, elasticity of the straps and the shape of FFR respirators, even after 20 cycles. All the more reason to believe that at room temperature the qualities of surgical masks, made of polypropylene like FFRs, do not diminish either.

Viscusi, D. J., King, W. P., & Shaffer, R. E. (2007). Effect of Decontamination on the Filtration Efficiency of Two Filtering Facepiece Respirator Models. Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection, 2493.

The filtering properties of N95 masks are not degraded by fifty 30-minute cycles at 85°. A fortiori, one can think that at room temperature the qualities of surgical masks, made of polypropylene like N95, do not diminish either.

Liao, L., Xiao, W., Zhao, M., Yu, X., Wang, H., Wang, Q., Chu, S., & Cui, Y. (2020). Can N95 Respirators Be Reused after Disinfection? How Many Times?. ACS nano, acsnano.0c03597. Advance online publication.

In times of mask shortage, the inventor of the N95 mask (equivalent to the FFP2 mask) advises doctors to use four masks in rotation over four days after marking them 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Juang, P. S., & Tsai, P. (2020). N95 Respirator Cleaning and Reuse Methods Proposed by the Inventor of the N95 Mask Material. Journal of Emergency Medicine.

This non-scientific article, among many others, suggests several ways to reuse a surgical mask. It quotes Michael Chang, an infectious disease specialist at the University Health Science Center in Houston, Texas. Chang suggests keeping the masks for four days in a permeable box before reusing them.

Alix Couture, Reusing a surgical mask that's been lying around, is that a good idea? Huffingtonpost SCIENCE 9/24/2020

This scientific review describes several methods of mask decontamination, and describes three interesting facts about the envelope mask method. - The use of a seven-day rotation system is proposed, with seven different masks that have time to dry and decontaminate. - The filtration efficiency and air permeability of N95 masks does not change after being worn for 8 consecutive hours by volunteers. - A surgical mask washed for 2 min with soap and water loses half of its filtering power, but is still more filtering than a cloth mask.

Tsai, P. (2020). Performance of masks and discussion of the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2. Engineered Science, 10(2), 1-7.

This study shows that the static charges of the polypropylene electret of a surgical mask are cancelled out by immersion in water at 56°C for 30 minutes, but are partially restored by air drying: the mask then regains 60% of the charges of a new mask, and probably 60% of the filtration efficiency.

Wang, D., Sun, B. C., Wang, J. X., Zhou, Y. Y., Chen, Z. W., Fang, Y., ... & Chu, G. W. (2020). Can Masks Be Reused After Hot Water Decontamination During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Engineering.

Reuse of the surgical mask has very little effect on its filtration rate. After 3 cycles of 4 hours, filtration is still >90% and well above the fabric mask. The variation in filtration seen in these data is a loss of about 0.3 points per use and 0.3 points per heat sterilization. After 30 uses or sterilizations, surgical masks should therefore lose 9 filtration points, remaining higher than new fabric masks.

Song, W., Pan, B., Kan, H., Xu, Y., & Yi, Z. (2020). Heat inactivating and reusing of virus-contaminated disposable medical mask. medRxiv.

A laboratory evaluation of the short-term use of N95 masks once a week over several months, simulating use with a spray containing a 5 mg salt solution and storage in office conditions.

Moyer, E. S., & Bergman, M. S. (2000). Electrostatic N-95 respirator filter media efficiency degradation resulting from intermittent sodium chloride aerosol exposure. Applied occupational and environmental hygiene, 15(8), 600-608.

Three models of surgical masks were put on for a few minutes and taken off 20 times, and the fit was tested each time. The median fit of the masks decreases linearly but remains above 100, which is a good fit. It can be extrapolated that the median reaches 100 after 30 uses.

Bergman, M. S., Viscusi, D. J., Zhuang, Z., Palmiero, A. J., Powell, J. B., & Shaffer, R. E. (2012). Impact of multiple consecutive donnings on filtering facepiece respirator fit. American journal of infection control, 40(4), 375-380.

Ten surgical masks (conventional, three-layer polypropylene) were each machine washed ten times (60°C) with a detergent and then a disinfectant: their performance in filtering 3-micron particles remained virtually unchanged (99.8% according to EN 14683). The same performance was observed after 5 cycles of washing + autoclaving of ten different models of used surgical masks, each tested in 10 copies. On the other hand, for submicron particles, the filtration efficiency decreases significantly after the first wash, and in a very variable way (between 3 and 90% of the initial values, median 45%). This is due to the loss of electrostatic charges from the middle layer of the mask, made of electret polypropylene. In addition, the resistance of the outer layer of the mask to liquid splashes is negated by washing. On the other hand, the breathability of the masks remains excellent after washing and sterilisation. Finally, some elastics break during successive washes, and rust spots appear on the metal nose clip. Alcaraz's article focuses on the collective recycling of masks: he shows that the masks are well disinfected by the treatments tested, which allows the reuse of these recycled masks, which then correspond to the AFNOR S76-00 standard and retain the particles better than cloth masks.

Alcaraz, J. P., Le Coq, L., Pourchez, J., Thomas, D., Chazelet, S., Boudry, I., ... & Landelle, C. (2022). Reuse of medical face masks in domestic and community settings without sacrificing safety: Ecological and economical lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic. Chemosphere, 288, 132364.

Further reading

Why is it recommended not to wear a surgical mask for more than 4 hours?

What are the different types of masks?

Where and when should I put on a mask?

Do I have to wear a mask if I already had COVID-19?

Do I have to wear a mask if I don't have any symptoms?

Does the severity of the COVID disease depend on the dose of virus received?

Can a mask be used after its expiration date?

Counterfeit surgical masks: how to recognize a real mask from a fake one?